🔗 Share this article

At first, Trump seemed to take a strong position concerning the Ukrainian conflict. Following making warnings of "severe ramifications" last August in case Russia's president persisted obstructing peace negotiations, he ultimately introduced considerable penalties on Russia's two largest petroleum corporations, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision significantly impacted the Russian leader's ability to finance his aggression in Ukraine.

Yet, through his newly presented comprehensive peace initiative for Ukraine, that was created by US and Russian representatives excluding Ukraine's or European input, the former president has clearly reverted to his pro-Putin approach.

Rewarding Aggression

Trump's plan would essentially reward Putin for occupying Ukraine while putting Ukraine's democracy in danger. Although strong proclamations that "The nation's autonomy will be upheld", much of the initiative actually undermine that very sovereignty. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would likely be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Reflecting his business past, the former president seems to view the Ukrainian conflict as a basic territorial dispute, like giving Putin a part of Ukraine's territory will satisfy the president. But, Putin's war is not merely about controlling a destroyed swath of deindustrialized territory in eastern Ukraine. Rather, it is about Ukraine's democratic governance – and the Russian leader's apparent goal to eliminate it so it stops functions as an attractive example for the Russian people of the democratic government that Putin's growing autocracy prevents them.

Border Concessions

While keeping in status the presently separated regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Trump's initiative would compel Ukraine to abandon the entire this eastern territory. In addition to favoring the Russian Federation with land that its troops have been unable to occupy in over a lengthy period of fighting, this giveaway would leave Ukraine's military defenses critically compromised.

The area is the place of Ukraine's highly-touted "fortress belt", the fortified defensive positions that are a essential impediment to enemy progress. Trump would have Ukraine leave these positions, leaving Putin a open route to Kyiv in case he eventually opt to restart the hostilities.

Defense Reductions

Then, in a action that would make renewed fighting easier for Russia, the plan would force Ukraine to cut the size of its troops from their present 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a maximum of 600,000. Significantly, Trump's proposal sets no equivalent constraints on the invading army.

Apparently as a concession to Russia's campaign to characterize the nation's legitimate leadership as Nazis, Trump's proposal declares: "Every Nazi belief system and practices must be condemned and forbidden." Seemingly to emphasize this aspect, it insists that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in this period" of a ceasefire agreement. However, Trump sets no condition that the Russian leader jeopardize his authoritarian rule by holding votes in his own country.

Protection Commitments

To be sure, the plan makes Russia pledge not to "attack neighboring countries" and to "incorporate in law its policy of non-violence towards the EU and Ukraine". But taking into account that the Russian leadership has breached similar accords in the past – such as the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which Russia committed to recognize Ukraine's borders in return for relinquishing its Soviet-era nuclear weapons, and the previous peace deals, in which Moscow agreed to a halt in fighting and a return of seized land in the region to Kyiv – why should we believe Putin this time?

This explains Ukraine has been so insistent on international protection assurances. Although the plan warns of a "decisive coordinated defense action" if the Russian Federation renew its invasion, and states that "The nation will receive reliable protection assurances", the details range from unclear to alarming. The proposal would not just prevent the nation Nato membership but also preclude member states from deploying forces on the nation's land, thereby blocking the security presence, likely led by European powers, on which Ukraine had been relying to deter Russia from rebuilding his weakened forces, restocking, and attacking again.

International Concern

A separate side agreement apparently would grant Ukraine with a Nato-style security guarantee, in which any subsequent "significant, planned, and sustained aggression" by Russia on Ukraine "shall be regarded as an assault jeopardizing the tranquility of the allied countries." This indicates a military response. But unlike a powerful Ukrainian military – the nation's primary protection against future invasion – the effectiveness of the supplementary deal would depend on the willingness of Western powers, like Trump, to respond militarily to Putin's hostilities, something they have {not