It is heartbreaking’: how thirty captive beluga whales are now bargaining chips in dispute over inhumane treatment.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a large but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, public officials and welfare campaigners.
But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their fate often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the humans who see them each day.
After the federal government disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the cost of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Experts say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and group interactions indicate they are deeply intelligent animals – something one caretaker discovered personally.
She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a position that involved building relationships of the sea creatures.
“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.
“Eve chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Each changed the way I perceive bonding.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.
During her time at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the inadequate care in which they were maintained.
The park did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”
The facility did not respond to a request for comment, but previously stated: “The whales … get far higher quality medical attention and around the clock care than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the demise of a beluga, an ailing beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park suspected particulars of the incident were leaked to the press and she was fired shortly thereafter.
The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense staff”, trucks and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess advocates for calls for the whales to be taken promptly from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.
In late September, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“To approve the request would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that whales should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing authorize an transfer that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the minister’s remarks indicate a wider lack of awareness of the circumstances of existence for belugas raised in confinement.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion
As decision makers attempt to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for local populations.
A suggested sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been contentious. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a long term answer for eight of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.
Others say the idea of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable solution in the short term.
Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the facility will simulate the cognitive activities and diet the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|